• -
  • 10 June, 2024

Imetelstat Gets FDA Approval for Low- to Intermediate-1-Risk MDS With Transfusion-Dependent Anemia

Imetelstat (Rytelo) has been approved by the FDA to treat adult patients with low- to intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and transfusion-dependent anemia, who require four or more red blood cell (RBC) units across 8 weeks and are unresponsive, lost response to, or not eligible for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).1-3

"With the approval and availability of [imetelstat], we believe eligible patients with lower-risk MDS can potentially experience meaningful clinical benefit, particularly the potential for greater than 24 weeks of freedom from the burden of red blood cell transfusions and symptomatic anemia," said John A. Scarlett, MD, Geron’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, in a press release. "The approval of [imetelstat] as the first telomerase inhibitor is a testament to the power of our science and the passion of our people to innovate in the field of blood cancer.

The decision was supported by findings from the phase 3 IMerge study (NCT02598661), which showed that patients who received imetelstat (n = 118) experienced an 8-week RBC transfusion independence (RBC-TI) rate of 39.8% (95% CI, 30.9%-49.3%) vs 15% (95% CI, 7.1%-26.6%) for those who received placebo (n = 59; <.001).

About IMerge: Eligibility, Treatment, Objectives

The randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial enrolled patients with International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) low- or intermediate 1–risk MDS that was relapsed/refractory to an ESA or erythropoietin of more than 500 mU/mL if they were ineligible for an ESA.2 Patients also needed to be transfusion dependent, requiring at least 4 units of RBCs per 8 weeks over a 16-week pre-study. Patients could not have 5q deletions or have previously received lenalidomide (Revlimid) or hypomethylating agents.

Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive 7.1 mg/kg of intravenous imetelstat in 28-day treatment cycles or matching placebo. Stratification factors included transfusion burden (4 to 6 units vs >6 units) and IPSS risk category (low vs intermediate 1). All participants received supportive care, which included RBC transfusions.

The trial’s primary end point was rate of 8-week RBC-TI. Secondary end points included 24-week RBC-TI, duration of TI, hematologic improvement–erythroid (HI-E), and safety.

Efficacy was established after a median follow-up time of 19.5 months (range, 1.4-36.2) in the imetelstat arm and 17.5 months (range, 0.7-34.3) in the placebo arn based upon the proportion of patients who achieved 8-week or longer and 24-week or longer RBC TI.1

"For patients with lower-risk MDS and anemia who are transfusion dependent, we have very few options today and often cycle through available therapies, making the approval of [imetelstat] potentially practice changing for us," Rami Komrokji, MD, vice chair, Malignant Hematology Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, who was an investigator of the pivotal IMerge clinical trial, said in the release. "What is exciting about [imetelstat] is the totality of the clinical benefit across LR-MDS patients irrespective of ring sideroblast status or high transfusion burden, including sustained and durable transfusion independence and increases in hemoglobin levels, all within a well-characterized safety profile of generally manageable cytopenias. The treatment goal for patients with LR-MDS and anemia is transfusion-independence and before today, this wasn’t possible for many patients.”

Additional Data

The 16-, 24-, and 52-week RBC-TI rates with imetelstat were 31.4% (95% CI, 23.1%-40.5%), 28.0% (95% CI, 20.1%-37.0%), and 13.6% (95% CI, 8.0%-21.1%), respectively, vs 6.7% (95% CI, 1.9%-16.2%), 3.3% (95% CI, 0.4%-11.5%), and 1.7% (95% CI, 0%-8.9%) with placebo, respectively.

The median duration of RBC-TI was 51.6 weeks (95% CI, 26.9-83.9) with imetelstat vs 13.3 (95% CI, 8.0-24.9) with placebo (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.09-0.57; P < .001). In the entire study population, the median duration of the longest RBC-TI interval was 5.0 weeks (95% CI, 4.0-7.7) with imetelstat vs 3.9 weeks (95% CI, 3.6-4.0) with placebo.

Among evaluable 8-week RBC-TI responders, those who in the imetelstat arm (n = 47) experienced a median hemoglobin rise of 3.6 g/dL (range, –0.1 to 13.8) vs 0.8 g/dL (range, –0.2 to 1.7) for those in the placebo arm (n = 9). The median hemoglobin peak was 11.3 g/dL (range, 8.0-21.9) vs 8.9 g/dL (range, 7.9-9.7), respectively.

The rate of HI-E was 64% with imetelstat vs 52% with placebo, failing to show a significant difference between arms (P < .112). Additionally, neither complete or partial response occurred with either imetelstat or placebo. Stable disease was achieved by 69% of patients given imetelstat vs 68% of those who received placebo. Disease progression occurred in 6% and 3% of patients, respectively. Twenty-four percent and 28% of patients were not evaluable, largely owing to absent post-baseline bone marrow assessment.

At the time of the primary analysis, the hazard ratio for OS was 1.07 (95% CI, 0.46-2.48). At the time of the updated analysis with over 2 years of follow-up, the hazard ratio for OS was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.53-1.82). Specifically, the median OS was 40.4 months (95% CI, 37.1-not estimable [NE]) with imetelstat and NE (95% CI, 32.2-NE) with placebo.

PRO analysis revealed no difference in the deterioration in FACIT fatigue, at 43% and 46% with imetelstat and placebo, respectively. However, PROs were evaluated infrequently, according to the FDA, with available data dropping to below 50% after cycle 8 of treatment. Fifty percent or higher reductions in variant allele frequency in SF3B1 (29.5% vs 2.6%), TET2 (34.3% vs 8.3%), DNMT3A (11.1% vs 0.0%), and ASXL1 (40.0% vs 16.7%) occurred in higher percentages of those in the imetelstat arm vs those in the placebo arm, respectively.

Safety Insights

Grade 3/4 adverse effects (AEs) were experienced by 91% of patients on imetelstat vs 48% of those on placebo. Serious AEs occurred in 32% and 22% of patients, respectively.

Fourteen of patients experienced AEs that resulted in discontinuation of imetelstat. AE-related dose reduction or delay were required in 70% of those in the imetelstat arm vs 24% of those on the placebo arm.

Grade 3/4 cytopenia was significantly more common with imetelstat vs placebo, with decreased rates of neutrophil counts, leukocyte counts, and platelet counts of 71%, 53%, and 65%, vs 7%, 1.7%, and 8%, respectively. This led to a greater need for myeloid growth factor (35% vs 3%) and platelet transfusion (18% vs 2%) for those on imetelstat vs placebo. Despite these interventions, the rates of grade 3/4 infections and hemorrhage were 11% (all grade, 42%) and 2.5% (all grade, 21%) with imetelstat.

The most common toxicities experienced by 10% or more of patients, including laboratory abnormalities, comprised decreased platelet counts, decreased white blood cells, decreased neutrophil counts, increased aspartate aminotransferase, increased alkaline phosphatase, increased alanine aminotransferase, fatigue, prolonged partial thromboplastin time, arthralgia/myalgia, COVID-19 infections, and headache.

The Road to Approval

In March 2024, The FDA’s Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted 12 to 2 that the benefits of imetelstat outweigh its risks for the treatment of transfusion-dependent anemia in adult patients with IPSS low- to intermediate-1–risk MDS who have not responded to, have lost response to, or are ineligible for ESAs.2

References

1. FDA approves imetelstat for low- to intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes with transfusion-dependent anemia. FDA. June 6, 2024. Accessed June 6, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-imetelstat-low-intermediate-1-risk-myelodysplastic-syndromes-transfusion-dependent

2.March 14, 2024, Meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC). FDA. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Om-cKKBsMS4

3.Zeidan AM, Platzbecker U, Santini V, et al. IMerge: results from a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of imetelstat in patients (pts) with heavily transfusion dependent (TD) non-del(5q) lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) relapsed/refractory (R/R) to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA). J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(suppl 16):7004. doi:10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.7004

Categories:
Tags :
Comments :
Hailey Avatar
Hailey - 2 weeks ago
My name is Hailey Garcia and I am from New Jersey. My herpes virus turned to war after 2 years of living with it. I have tried different medical procedures to cure my herpes but to no avail. Most people think herpes is only a minor skin irritation of which herpes has long term effects on health and passes through the bloodstream and can be easily contracted through sexual intercourse. I knew I had herpes from the first day I started feeling itchy in my pubic area and the pain was very unbearable. I couldn't stand it anymore. After 2 years of trying other means to get rid of it, I had to contact Doctor Odunga to help me with a permanent cure. I saw his email and whats-app number from a testimony I read online from a lady who was also helped by him in curing infertility problems, I had faith and contacted him. He assured me of his work and I ordered his herbal medicine. Within 5 days, I didn't feel any pain anymore and within 2 weeks, my skin was all cleared and smooth. I am very grateful to you sir and I write this testimony as others have done to bring those having faith to you sir. If you have herpes or other similar disease and you want it cured, kindly contact Doctor Odunga, Whats-App (wa.me/+2348167159012) OR Email [email protected]

Authentication required

You must log in to post a comment.

Log in

Upcoming webinars:

  • 30 March,2025
Hybrid CorticoBasal Implantology Concept : An Approach for treatment of Full arch Situation

Learn the Hybrid Corticobasal Implantology Concept for full-arch treatments with advanced techniques and clinical insights.

  • 5 April,2025
AI in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery: The Future of Precision & Innovation

This webinar explores how AI is revolutionizing diagnostics, treatment planning, and surgery. It also covers challenges and ethical concerns.

  • 6 April,2025
MDS Roadmap: Your Guide to a Successful Postgraduate Journey

This webinar will explain the requirements of an MDS degree and How to Master Academics, Research, and Clinical Skills.

  • 6 April,2025
Know Where to STOP’ – Tactics to Prevent Complication in Oral Surgery

Learn key tactics to prevent complications in oral surgery and enhance surgical outcomes.

  • 6 April,2025
Sealed for Success: Mastering Rubber Dam Isolation

A step-by-step guide to achieving seamless rubber dam isolation for efficient and predictable restorative and endodontic procedures.

  • 12 April,2025
Next-Gen Hair Restoration: Innovations, Techniques and Challenges

Explore the latest advancements in hair restoration, from FUE & FUT to robotic transplants, stem cell therapy, and AI-driven innovations.

  • 12 April,2025
Role of PRF in Endodontics: Unlocking the Power of Regeneration

Discover how Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) Enhances Endodontic Healing and Regeneration for Better Patient Outcomes.

  • 13 April,2025
Dental Specialty Training in India and UK

Dental specialty training, fellowships after BDS in India.

  • 13 April,2025
Minimal invasive dentistry - The Art of Precision and Preservation

Saving Smiles with Minimal Invasive Techniques for Modern Dental Care